[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330399020.2822.106.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:17:01 +0000
From: James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"kyle@...artin.ca" <kyle@...artin.ca>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
"dave.anglin@...l.net" <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] parisc: dont unconditionally override CROSS_COMPILE
for 64 bit.
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:04 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 27 February 2012 17:03:10 James Bottomley wrote:
> > --- a/arch/parisc/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/parisc/Makefile
> >
> > -CROSS_COMPILE := hppa64-linux-gnu-
> > +
> > +# if no default set, try to find the corresponding 64 bit compiler
> > +ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> > +CROSS_COMPILE := $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine | sed s/hppa-\\\(.*\\\)/hppa64-\\1-/)
> > +endif
>
> fails when using "hppa2.0-xxx". perhaps:
> CROSS_COMPILE ?= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine | sed 's/^hppa[^-]*-/hppa64-/')
>
> don't even need the ifeq check then
How is that different from Carlos' suggestion? The reason it doesn't
work is the same ... CROSS_COMPILE is defined to be empty.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists