[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202280106.23643.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:06:20 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"kyle@...artin.ca" <kyle@...artin.ca>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
"dave.anglin@...l.net" <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] parisc: dont unconditionally override CROSS_COMPILE for 64 bit.
On Monday 27 February 2012 22:17:01 James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:04 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 27 February 2012 17:03:10 James Bottomley wrote:
> > > --- a/arch/parisc/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/parisc/Makefile
> > >
> > > -CROSS_COMPILE := hppa64-linux-gnu-
> > > +
> > > +# if no default set, try to find the corresponding 64 bit compiler
> > > +ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> > > +CROSS_COMPILE := $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine | sed
> > > s/hppa-\\\(.*\\\)/hppa64-\\1-/) +endif
> >
> > fails when using "hppa2.0-xxx". perhaps:
> > CROSS_COMPILE ?= $(shell $(CC) -dumpmachine | sed
> > 's/^hppa[^-]*-/hppa64-/')
> >
> > don't even need the ifeq check then
>
> How is that different from Carlos' suggestion?
sorry, but i'm not seeing any e-mails from Carlos in this thread. what is his
suggestion ?
> The reason it doesn't work is the same ... CROSS_COMPILE is defined to be
> empty.
my suggestion was purely an incremental improvement on the patch you posted.
it improves two things:
- detection when the default tuple is hppa2.0-xxx rather than hppa-xxx
- one line for set-variable-only-when-its-unset rather than three lines
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists