linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Fix up CFI for the nested NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4F4CA97F0200007800075205@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:16:31 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Fix up CFI for the
 nested NMI

>>> On 28.02.12 at 10:06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:39 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > So either you do an obviously trivial patch that only adds 
>> > CFI annotations and nothing else, or I can pull these bits 
>> > into tip:x86/debug, for a v3.4 merge.
>> 
>> I'm fine with waiting for v3.4 before these changes get in.
> 
> Jan, is that fine with you?

Yes, absolutely (I never expected these changes to be proposed for
inclusion in 3.3, given that I didn't have the time to get them done
and submitted before -rc4).

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/