linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Fix up CFI for the nested NMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120228093907.GA424@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:39:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL][v3.3] x86: Fix up CFI for the nested NMI


* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:

> >>> On 28.02.12 at 10:06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:39 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > So either you do an obviously trivial patch that only adds 
> >> > CFI annotations and nothing else, or I can pull these bits 
> >> > into tip:x86/debug, for a v3.4 merge.
> >> 
> >> I'm fine with waiting for v3.4 before these changes get in.
> > 
> > Jan, is that fine with you?
> 
> Yes, absolutely (I never expected these changes to be proposed 
> for inclusion in 3.3, given that I didn't have the time to get 
> them done and submitted before -rc4).

Ok, pulled it into x86/asm for v3.4, thanks guys!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/