[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120228174049.GA11136@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:40:50 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + procfs-mark-thread-stack-correctly-in-proc-pid-maps.patch
added to -mm tree
On 02/28, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> +int vm_is_stack(struct task_struct *task,
> >> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, int in_group)
> >> +{
> >> + if (vm_is_stack_for_task(task, vma))
> >> + return 1;
> >> +
> >> + if (in_group) {
> >> + struct task_struct *t = task;
> >> + while_each_thread(task, t) {
> >> + if (vm_is_stack_for_task(t, vma))
> >> + return 1;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > This is obviously wrong, while_each_thread() is not safe without
> > tasklist or siglock or rcu.
>
> I have fixed this in my git stash. I'll submit
OK, please CC me ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists