[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120229185056.GA11757@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:50:56 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Questions about ptrace on a dying process
On 02/29, Tim Bird wrote:
>
> ptrace maintainers (and interested parties)...
>
> I'm working on a crash handler for Linux, which uses ptrace to retrieve information
> about a process during it's coredump. Specifically, from within a core handler
> program (started within do_coredump() as a user_mode_helper), I would like to make
> ptrace calls against the dying process.
Which calls? just curious.
> My problem is that the process state is not entering into TASK_TRACED, when
> I do an PTRACE_ATTACH against it.
Yes, it can never do ptrace_stop() in do_coredump() paths.
Perhaps you can use PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT. PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT will be reported
after the coredumping. I think the core handler should close the pipe first,
otherwise the dumping tracee will wait for the handler forever.
However. You need PTRACE_SEIZE, not PTRACE_ATTACH. And this can only work
with the recent patch from Denys which allows to pass PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT
with PTRACE_SEIZE (currently in -mm tree).
Just in case, it could have other threads sleeping in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
until do_coredump() completes. But these threads have already passed
ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT).
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists