[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAObL_7GdhNPNsSiTF+GfbJ3_8ud8px6=LBH173uy14y58FMivg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:16:32 -0800
From: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh
before kfree()
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 02/29, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On 02/24/2012 11:07 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> > This patch adds the special event, POLLFREE, currently only for
>> > epoll. It expects that init_poll_funcptr()'ed hook should do the
>> > necessary cleanup. Perhaps it should be defined as EPOLLFREE in
>> > eventpoll.
>>
>> I have a bunch of userspace code that uses signalfd via epoll. Does
>> this affect the ABI?
>
> I hope not ;)
>
Excellent!
To avoid further confusion, would it make sense to update the comment
in poll.h to indicate that POLLFREE is only for epoll and is internal
to the kernel?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists