[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120229202113.GA31780@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:21:13 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: the briq panel isn't a tty, make it use its own
locking
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:37:17PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 22:56 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Hrm, I don't think anybody maintains it but I do have a BriQ somewhere
> > > in storage, so I suppose I could pick it up, not that I need another
> > > crap driver to deal with right now though...
> >
> > In which case can we just stuff it into the tree, or take the briq driver
> > out into staging as this is the last blocker on tackling the tty_lock
> > entirely in the tty layer
>
> Just remove the driver, I don't think anybody cares.
Wonderful, I'll go do that right now :)
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists