linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F4EEE55.4040506@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:34:45 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced

At 02/29/2012 06:39 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 02/29/2012 12:17 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, crash can be so severe that it is not even detected by a kernel
>>>> itself, so not OOPS message even printed. But in most cases if kernel is
>>>> functional enough to print OOPS it is functional enough to call single
>>>> hypercall instruction.
>>>
>>> Why not print the oops to virtio-serial?  Or even just a regular serial
>>> port?  That's what bare metal does.
>>
>> If virtio-serial's driver has bug or the guest doesn't have such device...
> 
> We have the same issue with the hypercall; and virtio-serial is
> available on many deployed versions.

How to know whether a guest has virtio-serial?

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
>>>
>>>>>> Having special kdump
>>>>>> kernel that transfers dump to a host via virtio-serial channel though
>>>>>> sounds interesting. May be that's what you mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes.  The "panic, starting dump" signal should be initiated by the
>>>>> panicking kernel though, in case the dump fails.
>>>>>
>>>> Then panic hypercall sounds like a reasonable solution.
>>>
>>> It is, but I'm trying to see if we can get away with doing nothing.
>>>
>>
>> If we have a reliable way with doing nothing, it is better. But I donot
>> find such way.
> 
> We won't have a 100% reliable way.  But I think a variant of the driver
> that doesn't use interrupts, or just using the ordinary serial driver,
> should be reliable enough.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/