[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120305155642.GB32413@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:56:42 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, dsahern@...il.com, ravitillo@....gov,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
A third usability bug is that for some reason a branch sampling
'perf report' defaults to the stdio output on my testsystem -
with --no-branch-stack it gives the regular tui.
Even specifying --tui explicitly does not restore the TUI. Is
there any fundamental reason why the branch stack does not
support the TUI?
A fourth bug is that regular profiling appears to be busted:
aldebaran:> perf record -a sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.026 MB perf.data (~1120 samples) ]
aldebaran:~> perf report
Warning: TUI interface not supported in branch mode
selected -b but no branch data. Did you call perf record without -b?
Guys, why are you sending me these patches? The tooling side is
utterly untested and very raw yet.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists