[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330965033.11248.240.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:30:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com,
ravitillo@....gov, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> A third usability bug is that for some reason a branch sampling
> 'perf report' defaults to the stdio output on my testsystem -
> with --no-branch-stack it gives the regular tui.
>
>
Ah, I would not have noticed that since I still explicitly build my perf
without TUI support. That stuff mostly just gets in the way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists