[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQ5iC9TB=W4=19SghYdz9D6z6sXrBerm78TuVwk+W8sBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:32:26 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com, ravitillo@....gov,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> A third usability bug is that for some reason a branch sampling
>> 'perf report' defaults to the stdio output on my testsystem -
>> with --no-branch-stack it gives the regular tui.
>>
>>
> Ah, I would not have noticed that since I still explicitly build my perf
> without TUI support. That stuff mostly just gets in the way.
I tend to agree with Peter here.
There is no TUI support for branch as of now.
I will fix the other two bugs you reported.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists