[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120305172008.GA29411@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:20:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, dsahern@...il.com,
ravitillo@....gov, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> A third usability bug is that for some reason a branch sampling
> >> 'perf report' defaults to the stdio output on my testsystem -
> >> with --no-branch-stack it gives the regular tui.
> >>
> >>
> > Ah, I would not have noticed that since I still explicitly
> > build my perf without TUI support. That stuff mostly just
> > gets in the way.
>
> I tend to agree with Peter here.
I use the TUI most of the time (it allows me to navigate and
look at annotated output easily - something the --stdio one
cannot do), and I know at least two other kernel developers who
prefer the TUI, so it's a YMMV thing.
> There is no TUI support for branch as of now.
Why? What would be needed to add proper TUI support?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists