linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:35:18 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, ravitillo@....gov,
	khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@...com,
	robert.richter@....com, ming.m.lin@...el.com,
	vweaver1@...s.utk.edu, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode

Em Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > A third usability bug is that for some reason a branch sampling 
> > 'perf report' defaults to the stdio output on my testsystem - 
> > with --no-branch-stack it gives the regular tui.

> Ah, I would not have noticed that since I still explicitly build my perf
> without TUI support. That stuff mostly just gets in the way.

Do you have any specific complaints about it?

There were changes to make it work as the stdio one when navigation keys
aren't used, i.e. color scheme, etc.

Its not there to be in the way, but to be useful, so any specific
complaints I would love to hear from you.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/