[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203061345150.2742@ionos>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:52:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
cc: maglyx@...il.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
clemens@...isch.de, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] hpet: factor timer allocate from open
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Magnus Lynch <maglyx@...il.com>
> Subject: hpet: factor timer allocate from open
>
> The current implementation of the /dev/hpet driver couples opening the
> device with allocating one of the (scarce) timers (aka comparators). This
> is a limitation in that the main counter may be valuable to applications
> seeking a high-resolution timer who have no use for the interrupt
> generating functionality of the comparators.
>
> This patch alters the open semantics so that when the device is opened, no
> timer is allocated. Operations that depend on a timer being in context
> implicitly attempt allocating a timer, to maintain backward compatibility.
AFAICT, there is only fasync which calls hpet_alloc_timer(). All other
functions are broken by this chage.
> There is also an IOCTL (HPET_ALLOC_TIMER _IO) added so that the
> allocation may be done explicitly. (I prefer the explicit open then
And that IOCTL does what? Return 0 is not really useful functionality.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists