[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F562775.2010501@ladisch.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:04:21 +0100
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, maglyx@...il.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] hpet: factor timer allocate from open
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>> From: Magnus Lynch <maglyx@...il.com>
>> Subject: hpet: factor timer allocate from open
>>
>> The current implementation of the /dev/hpet driver couples opening the
>> device with allocating one of the (scarce) timers (aka comparators). This
>> is a limitation in that the main counter may be valuable to applications
>> seeking a high-resolution timer who have no use for the interrupt
>> generating functionality of the comparators.
>>
>> This patch alters the open semantics so that when the device is opened, no
>> timer is allocated. Operations that depend on a timer being in context
>> implicitly attempt allocating a timer, to maintain backward compatibility.
>
> AFAICT, there is only fasync which calls hpet_alloc_timer(). All other
> functions are broken by this chage.
Indeed. There was another call in hpet_ioctl_common(), but it appears
that one somehow got dropped.
Magnus, is this the patch that you submitted and have tested?
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists