[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <aefc95$3e4bn0@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:12:29 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/intel_i2c: return -ENXIO for device NAK
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:50:47 +0800, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org> wrote:
> Return -ENXIO if a device NAKs a transaction.
>
> Note: We should return -ETIMEDOUT, too if the transaction times out,
> however, that error path is currently handled by the 'bit-bang fallback'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Can you clarify what the rule is if an error is detected part-way
through a xfer?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists