[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f80fcd$3o8hke@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:17:30 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/intel_i2c: cleanup gmbus/gpio pin assignments
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:50:45 +0800, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org> wrote:
> There is no "disabled" port 0. So, don't even try to initialize/scan
> it, etc. This saves a bit of time when initializing the driver, since
> the we can avoid a 50ms timeout waiting for a device to respond on
> a port that doesn't even exist.
>
> Similarly, don't initialize the reserved port, either.
> @@ -150,32 +164,23 @@ static void set_data(void *data, int state_high)
> static struct i2c_adapter *
> intel_gpio_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pin)
> {
> - static const int map_pin_to_reg[] = {
> - 0,
> - GPIOB,
> - GPIOA,
> - GPIOC,
> - GPIOD,
> - GPIOE,
> - GPIOF,
> - 0,
> - };
> struct intel_gpio *gpio;
>
> - if (pin >= ARRAY_SIZE(map_pin_to_reg) || !map_pin_to_reg[pin])
And that doesn't do what your changelog proposes? Why?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists