[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120307144643.GB2009@x61.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:46:44 -0300
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] mm: SLAB Out-of-memory diagnostics
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:42:57PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> > > Following the example at mm/slub.c, add out-of-memory diagnostics to the
> > > SLAB allocator to help on debugging certain OOM conditions.
> > >
> > > An example print out looks like this:
> > >
> > > <snip page allocator out-of-memory message>
> > > SLAB: Unable to allocate memory on node 0 (gfp=0x11200)
> > > cache: bio-0, object size: 192, order: 0
> > > node0: slabs: 3/3, objs: 60/60, free: 0
> > >
> >
> > Nitpick:
> >
> > What about "node: 0" instead of "node0: " ?
> >
>
> Good catch, that format would match the output of the slub out-of-memory
> messages.
>
To be honest, I really don't see a big advantage on the nitpick, however, if we
want to accurately copycat the slub output here, I can insert a blank space
between the word and the digit, like the following:
"node #: ..."
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists