linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: fix io_setup/io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120307165018.GG29014@kvack.org>
Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:50:18 -0500
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix io_setup/io_destroy race

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:16:35AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Have ioctx_alloc() return an extra reference, so that caller would drop it
> on success and not bother with re-grabbing it on failure exit.  The current
> code is obviously broken - io_destroy() from another thread that managed
> to guess the address io_setup() would've returned would free ioctx right
> under us; gets especially interesting if aio_context_t * we pass to
> io_setup() points to PROT_READ mapping, so put_user() fails and we end
> up doing io_destroy() on kioctx another thread has just got freed...
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>

The fix looks good, and works with a quick test program checking the two cases 
involved (ioctx create success + failure due to PROT_READ).

		-ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/