[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120307172116.GF12083@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:21:16 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, balbi@...com,
Matt Porter <mporter@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x
regulators
* Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com> [120307 07:28]:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com> wrote:
> >
> > In either case $SUBJECT patch is already in Tony's fixes queue, so if it
> > is going be merged, then my fix above is needed also to not break
> > Overo and any other platform that has more than one smsc911x instance.
> >
> > Kevin
>
>
> Have you tested this fix? The only regulator consumer supply would be:
>
> static struct regulator_consumer_supply gpmc_smsc911x_supply[] = {
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vddvario", "smsc911x.0"),
> REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdd33a", "smsc911x.0"),
> };
>
> I don't think the second smsc911x on the Overo, "smsc911x.1", would
> find it due to the dev_id.
Hmm yeah sounds like there's some further changes needed. Dropping
the second version from fixes until we have somebody reply with
tested-by using two smsc911x instances.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists