[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANKRQnjFB8G5iRKZLQok+qnQrPXf7vcRGto_OyL+1=VNBTnetw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:16:50 +0900
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com, kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sound/soc/codecs: add LAPIS Semiconductor ML26124
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>> > This is not what the above prototype says, the above prototype has only
>> > one register in it. You need to make this *much* clearer for the
>> > registers it's affecting.
>> Sorry, I couldn't understand your saying / concern.
>> Do you mean I shouldn't use ml26124_update_bits() but snd_soc_update_bits() ?
> Ideally you should be using the framework features. If there is some
> reason why you can't you need to make it much clearer what the reason
> is so people reading the code can understand.
If possible, I want to use framework features. However, I judged it is
not possible.
Let me confirm again.
As I said before, all ML26124 registers need to be accessed by
different address when read and write.
Like below
R W
$00h $01h Sampling setting
$02h $03h PLL setting
...
Even so, can I use framework features ?
thanks,
--
ROHM Co., Ltd.
tomoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists