[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F57CCB9.9090001@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:01:45 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <rw@...utronix.de>
To: dedekind1@...il.com
CC: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] UBI checkpointing support
Am 07.03.2012 17:04, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> Another not-so-technical comment.
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:06 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> The following patch set implements checkpointing support for
>> UBI. Checkpointing is an optional feature which stores the physical to
>> logical eraseblock relations in a checkpointing superblock to reduce
>> the initialization time of UBI.
>
> So this is basically about improving scalability and "mount" time. This
> has nothing to do with checkpointing most people are aware of.
> Confusing...
Mostly because "checkpointing" is a buzzword. ;-)
> Really, this tirm is already reserved by file-systems, things like
> virtual machines where it means "freezing" the contents and doing COW
> when changing the freezed blocks and guaranteeing the ability to
> "roll-back" to the checkpointed data.
>
> Please, consider an option of picking a different name. In JFFS2 a
> "similar" thing was called "summaries", and even this is better than
> "checkpoint", I think.
What about "Erase block indexing"?
Basically a checkpoint is an index...
Thanks,
//richard
P.s: I'm really bad in picking names.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists