linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4xJoKGt3+b_3bteoMyeO615pCxFpMpsH4LtvufFNDv6bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:57:31 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	Barry Song <Barry.Song@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	workgroup.linux@....com, mina86@...a86.com,
	Barry Song <Baohua.Song@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to
 test CMA

2012/3/7 Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>:
> On 03/07/2012 12:49 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>
>> 2012/3/7 Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>:
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2012 11:14 AM, Barry Song wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@....com>
>>>>
>>>> Any write request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to allocate
>>>> memory
>>>> from
>>>> CMA, for example:
>>>>
>>>> 1st time
>>>> $ echo 1024>    /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to request 1MB(1024KB)
>>>> 2nd time
>>>> $ echo 2048>    /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to request 2MB(2048KB)
>>>>
>>>> Any read request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to free the 1st
>>>> valid
>>>> memory from CMA, for example:
>>>>
>>>> 1st time
>>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to free the 1MB allocated in the first write
>>>> request
>>>> 2nd time
>>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to free the 2MB allocated in the second write
>>>> request
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any reason why using /dev not /proc or /sys?
>>
>>
>> pls note it is just a test module to verify CMA at runtime. it is not
>> important either it is /dev, it is /proc or it is /sys.
>
>
> Why not important? You want it to be merged, don't you?
>
>
>>
>> any way to make things easier, we take that way.
>>
>
> Why /dev interface is easier than /proc and /sys? Confused, actually I think
> /proc or /sys should be easier...

if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b.

-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/