[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F56EAE8.8060502@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:58:16 +0800
From: Zhengwang Ruan <ruan.zhengwang@...il.com>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chris+android@...thought.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] Staging:android: Initialise buffer and buffer_size
before used
-------- Original Message --------
From: Arve Hjønnevåg
Sent: 2012年03月06日 星期二 20时01分58秒
To: Zhengwang Ruan
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] Staging:android: Initialise buffer and
buffer_size
before used
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Zhengwang Ruan<ruan.zhengwang@...il.com> wrote:
>> GCC warns 'buffer' and 'buffer_size' are used with being uninitialized, and
>> 'buffer' is used as returned value, and 'buffer_size' is initialized using
>> uninitialized_var to clear warning.
> Why do you clear the warning on buffer_size with uninitialized_var()
> but not on buffer?
struct binder_buffer *buffer;
size_t buffer_size;
struct rb_node *best_fit = NULL;
I see 'best_fit' is initialized by being directly assigned a NULL
pointer, I think it should be better to initialize pointer in this way.
> Neither variable is used before being initialized.
>
I got the following compiling warning against buffer ans buffer_size:
drivers/staging/android/binder.c:719:24: warning: ‘buffer’ may be used
uninitialized in this function
drivers/staging/android/binder.c:720:9: warning: ‘buffer_size’ may be
used uninitialized in this function
Thanks,
-Zhengwang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists