[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120308211406.GA24445@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:14:06 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Masami Ichikawa <masami256@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in sysfs_sd_setsecdata().
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:02:20PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Masami Ichikawa <masami256@...il.com> writes:
>
> > This patch fixies follwing two memory leak patterns that reported by kmemleak.
> > sysfs_sd_setsecdata() is called during sys_lsetxattr() operation.
> > It checks sd->s_iattr is NULL or not. Then if it is NULL, it calls
> > sysfs_init_inode_attrs() to allocate memory.
> > That code is this.
>
> I don't know how you count two memory leaks. But there is definitely a
> leak here sd->s_iattr is allocated and then never assigned. It looks
> like I introduced that leak when I re-factored the code to protect
> the code with sysfs_mutex at the end of 2009.
>
> I am surprise the securlity label crowd has not been screaming about
> selinux protection not working on sysfs for the last two years.
>
> I have reviewed the code and the fix looks obvious and correct.
>
> Greg can you pick this up?
I applied it a while ago to my tree already :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists