[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1aa3qwyz6.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:43:09 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Masami Ichikawa <masami256@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in sysfs_sd_setsecdata().
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:02:20PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Masami Ichikawa <masami256@...il.com> writes:
>>
>> > This patch fixies follwing two memory leak patterns that reported by kmemleak.
>> > sysfs_sd_setsecdata() is called during sys_lsetxattr() operation.
>> > It checks sd->s_iattr is NULL or not. Then if it is NULL, it calls
>> > sysfs_init_inode_attrs() to allocate memory.
>> > That code is this.
>>
>> I don't know how you count two memory leaks. But there is definitely a
>> leak here sd->s_iattr is allocated and then never assigned. It looks
>> like I introduced that leak when I re-factored the code to protect
>> the code with sysfs_mutex at the end of 2009.
>>
>> I am surprise the securlity label crowd has not been screaming about
>> selinux protection not working on sysfs for the last two years.
>>
>> I have reviewed the code and the fix looks obvious and correct.
>>
>> Greg can you pick this up?
>
> I applied it a while ago to my tree already :)
Odd I didn't see it linux-next when I looked an hour or so ago.
As long as it is there and it makes it to stable.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists