[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5A6D87.4050809@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:52:23 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] boot: ignore early NMIs
Okay, I need to ask this...
Is there a reason to not just simply block these NMIs during the kexec
sequence?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists