| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:06 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: richardcochran@...il.com Cc: tshimizu818@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, jdmason@...zu.us, john.stultz@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, khc@...waw.pl, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com, kok.howg.ewe@...el.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:30:32 +0100 > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:34:53PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> >> You still haven't submitted this properly. >> >> First, you submitted the PCH_GBE driver changes before the EG20T >> PTP clock driver which it depends upon. > > David, both this pair of patches and the second pair apply cleanly to > both Torvalds mainline and to net-next. So, what are you complaining > about here? I am still confused. I'm complaining submitting changes properly, and that has nothing to do with where or how cleanly the patches apply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists