[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120311183856.GA13869@game.jcrosoft.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:38:56 +0100
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA
On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar , Alan Ott wrote:
> Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which
> chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done
> by Arnd Bergmann.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
> CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
> config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> bool
>
> +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> + bool
what is the need for this?
As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT
Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists