[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201203112136.47694.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:36:47 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>, Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA
On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET
> > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> > bool
> >
> > +config AT91_HAS_PATA
> > + bool
> what is the need for this?
>
> As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore
> if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT
>
When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying
to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations
in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this
patch can be dropped.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists