[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120312184549.GG12405@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:45:49 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
git@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Rast <trast@...dent.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: stripping [PATCH] without losing later tags from mailed patches (Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > I've just backported it to 1.7.9.3 (I'm not keen on living on the bleeding
> > edge with my everyday tools), and it works nicely as expected.
>
> This topic will be backported in later versions of 1.7.9.x track,
> but living on the maintenance track does not have much smaller
> chance of breakage than living on the tip of 'master' these days,
> unless you are using distro packaged version. The usual rule of
> thumb if you are compiling from the source is that the tip of
> 'master' is more stable than any tagged version, including the
> maintenance track. See
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/189657/focus=190814
>
> for details.
I know, but you see I was running on 1.7.2.3. Generally if one version
works for me, I don't upgrade it for a year or two. I've been hit a few
times in the past by some quite annoying bugs (as is to be expected from
any software in the development branch), and lost a lot of time on this.
Rest assured that I don't feel comfortable on 1.7.9 either, that's a big
jump for me but I know that most often it works quite well :-)
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists