[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120312185008.GH12405@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:50:08 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
Thomas Rast <trast@....ethz.ch>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
git@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Rast <trast@...dent.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: stripping [PATCH] without losing later tags from mailed patches (Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support)
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> So perhaps we can safely claim -b for --keep-non-patch, like so:
>
> We can delete "git am -b" (as it was deprecated long time ago), wait
> for a cycle or two, and then repurpose it. I do not mind starting
> the first step (delete, but do not say anything about repurposing)
> before 1.7.10-rc1 happens.
>From my user experience and what I see on a number of coworkers, users
tend to make big jumps when they need a new feature, so in practice,
not offering the option in a version or two would probably not affect
most users, especially the ones still relying on the old behaviour. So
I don't see much benefit in waiting for repurposing the option.
Just my 2 cents,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists