[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5D5566.8030807@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:46:14 +0800
From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/2 v3] deal with guest panicked event
At 03/08/2012 07:56 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:52:45PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/08/2012 01:36 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:28:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 03/08/2012 12:15 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>>> When the host knows the guest is panicked, it will set
>>>>> exit_reason to KVM_EXIT_GUEST_PANICKED. So if qemu receive
>>>>> this exit_reason, we can send a event to tell management
>>>>> application that the guest is panicked and set the guest
>>>>> status to RUN_STATE_PANICKED.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> kvm-all.c | 5 +++++
>>>>> monitor.c | 3 +++
>>>>> monitor.h | 1 +
>>>>> qapi-schema.json | 2 +-
>>>>> qmp.c | 3 ++-
>>>>> vl.c | 1 +
>>>>> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>>>>> index 77eadf6..b3c9a83 100644
>>>>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>>>>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>>>>> @@ -1290,6 +1290,11 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
>>>>> (uint64_t)run->hw.hardware_exit_reason);
>>>>> ret = -1;
>>>>> break;
>>>>> + case KVM_EXIT_GUEST_PANICKED:
>>>>> + monitor_protocol_event(QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED, NULL);
>>>>> + vm_stop(RUN_STATE_PANICKED);
>>>>> + ret = -1;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the management application is not aware of this event, then it will
>>>> never resume the guest, so it will appear hung.
>>>
>>> Even if the mgmt app doesn't know about the QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED, it should
>>> still see a QEVENT_STOP event emitted by vm_stop() surely ? So it will
>>> know the guest CPUs have been stopped, even if it isn't aware of the
>>> reason why, which seems fine to me.
>>
>> No. The guest is stopped, and there's no reason to suppose that the
>> management app will restart it. Behaviour has changed.
>>
>> Suppose the guest has reboot_on_panic set; now the behaviour change is
>> even more visible - service will stop completely instead of being
>> interrupted for a bit while the guest reboots.
>
> Hmm, so this calls for a new command line argument to control behaviour,
> similar to what we do for disk werror, eg something like
>
> --onpanic "report|pause|stop|..."
>
> where
>
> report - emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED only
If the guest is panicked when libvirt is stopped, and we only emit a event,
we cannot know the guest is panicked when libvirt starts.
So I add a new RunState to solve this problem. If the guest is stopped when
it is panicked, it will change the behaviour. So I think the new RunState
should be a running state.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
> pause - emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and pause VM
> stop - emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and quit VM
> stop - emit QEVENT_GUEST_PANICKED and quit VM
>
> This would map fairly well into libvirt, where we already have config
> parameters for controlling what todo with a guest when it panics.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists