[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1331597724-31358-33-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:12:40 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [34-longterm 032/196] UBIFS: fix debugging failure in dbg_check_space_info
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
-------------------
This is a commit scheduled for the next v2.6.34 longterm release.
If you see a problem with using this for longterm, please comment.
-------------------
commit 7da6443aca9be29c6948dcbd636ad50154d0bc0c upstream.
This patch fixes a debugging failure with which looks like this:
UBIFS error (pid 32313): dbg_check_space_info: free space changed from 6019344 to 6022654
The reason for this failure is described in the comment this patch adds
to the code. But in short - 'c->freeable_cnt' may be different before
and after re-mounting, and this is normal. So the debugging code should
make sure that free space calculations do not depend on 'c->freeable_cnt'.
A similar issue has been reported here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/034647.html
This patch should fix it.
For the -stable guys: this patch is only relevant for kernels 2.6.30
onwards.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---
fs/ubifs/debug.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/debug.c b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
index c2a68ba..923d697 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/debug.c
@@ -961,11 +961,39 @@ void dbg_dump_index(struct ubifs_info *c)
void dbg_save_space_info(struct ubifs_info *c)
{
struct ubifs_debug_info *d = c->dbg;
-
- ubifs_get_lp_stats(c, &d->saved_lst);
+ int freeable_cnt;
spin_lock(&c->space_lock);
+ memcpy(&d->saved_lst, &c->lst, sizeof(struct ubifs_lp_stats));
+
+ /*
+ * We use a dirty hack here and zero out @c->freeable_cnt, because it
+ * affects the free space calculations, and UBIFS might not know about
+ * all freeable eraseblocks. Indeed, we know about freeable eraseblocks
+ * only when we read their lprops, and we do this only lazily, upon the
+ * need. So at any given point of time @c->freeable_cnt might be not
+ * exactly accurate.
+ *
+ * Just one example about the issue we hit when we did not zero
+ * @c->freeable_cnt.
+ * 1. The file-system is mounted R/O, c->freeable_cnt is %0. We save the
+ * amount of free space in @d->saved_free
+ * 2. We re-mount R/W, which makes UBIFS to read the "lsave"
+ * information from flash, where we cache LEBs from various
+ * categories ('ubifs_remount_fs()' -> 'ubifs_lpt_init()'
+ * -> 'lpt_init_wr()' -> 'read_lsave()' -> 'ubifs_lpt_lookup()'
+ * -> 'ubifs_get_pnode()' -> 'update_cats()'
+ * -> 'ubifs_add_to_cat()').
+ * 3. Lsave contains a freeable eraseblock, and @c->freeable_cnt
+ * becomes %1.
+ * 4. We calculate the amount of free space when the re-mount is
+ * finished in 'dbg_check_space_info()' and it does not match
+ * @d->saved_free.
+ */
+ freeable_cnt = c->freeable_cnt;
+ c->freeable_cnt = 0;
d->saved_free = ubifs_get_free_space_nolock(c);
+ c->freeable_cnt = freeable_cnt;
spin_unlock(&c->space_lock);
}
@@ -982,12 +1010,15 @@ int dbg_check_space_info(struct ubifs_info *c)
{
struct ubifs_debug_info *d = c->dbg;
struct ubifs_lp_stats lst;
- long long avail, free;
+ long long free;
+ int freeable_cnt;
spin_lock(&c->space_lock);
- avail = ubifs_calc_available(c, c->min_idx_lebs);
+ freeable_cnt = c->freeable_cnt;
+ c->freeable_cnt = 0;
+ free = ubifs_get_free_space_nolock(c);
+ c->freeable_cnt = freeable_cnt;
spin_unlock(&c->space_lock);
- free = ubifs_get_free_space(c);
if (free != d->saved_free) {
ubifs_err("free space changed from %lld to %lld",
--
1.7.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists