[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4F5EDD78.4070701@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:39:04 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] input: add MAX8997-haptic driver
On 03/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:31:24PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 03/07/2012 05:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:02:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> MAX8997 has several features in a single chip,
>>>> This patchset supports unimplemented haptic driver of MAX8997.
>>>>
>>>> v2
>>>> - code clean and remove unnecessary code according to comment of Dmitry
>>>> Torokhov
>>>
>>> Could you please tell me if the version of the patch I sent to you
>>> worked or not?
>>
>> It isn't worked because it use the mutex lock in irq handler stack.
>> so, I resend v3 patch of max8997-haptic driver after modifying it.
>
> Hmm, my patch did not add taking mutex in irq context, I presume you are
> talking about max8997->iolock that is taken in max8997_write_reg... OK,
> I see...
>
You're right. I'm sorry about my ambiguous reply for you.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists