[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6068F4.4090909@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:46:28 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
<containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC REPOST] cgroup: removing css reference drain wait during
cgroup removal
On 03/14/2012 04:28 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> IIUC, in general, even in the processes are in a tree, in major case
> of servers, their workloads are independent.
> I think FLAT mode is the dafault. 'heararchical' is a crazy thing which
> cannot be managed.
Better pay attention to the current overall cgroups discussions being
held by Tejun then. ([RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies)
The topic of whether of adapting all cgroups to be hierarchical by
deafult is a recurring one.
I personally think that it is not unachievable to make res_counters
cheaper, therefore making this less of a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists