[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F60777502000078000783B6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:48:21 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Li Dongyang" <lidongyang@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Squash the discard support for 'file'
and 'phy' type.
>>> On 13.03.12 at 23:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> The only reason for the distinction was for the special case of
> 'file' (which is assumed to be loopback device), was to reach inside
> the loopback device, find the underlaying file, and call fallocate on it.
> Fortunately "xen-blkback: convert hole punching to discard request on
> loop devices" removes that use-case and we now based the discard
> support based on blk_queue_discard(q) and extract all appropriate
> parameters from the 'struct request_queue'.
>
> CC: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@...ell.com>
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
(with a few minor remarks below)
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
> @@ -419,21 +419,17 @@ static int dispatch_discard_io(struct xen_blkif *blkif,
> int err = 0;
> int status = BLKIF_RSP_OKAY;
> struct block_device *bdev = blkif->vbd.bdev;
> -
> + unsigned long secure = 0;
Mind keeping the blank line and dropping the pointless initializer (which
future gcc is likely going to be warning about)?
> blkif->st_ds_req++;
>
> xen_blkif_get(blkif);
> - if (blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY ||
> - blkif->blk_backend_type == BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE) {
> - unsigned long secure = (blkif->vbd.discard_secure &&
> - (req->u.discard.flag & BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE)) ?
> - BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE : 0;
> - err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
> - req->u.discard.sector_number,
> - req->u.discard.nr_sectors,
> - GFP_KERNEL, secure);
> - } else
> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + secure = (blkif->vbd.discard_secure &&
> + (req->u.discard.flag & BLKIF_DISCARD_SECURE)) ?
> + BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE : 0;
> +
> + err = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, req->u.discard.sector_number,
> + req->u.discard.nr_sectors,
> + GFP_KERNEL, secure);
>
> if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> pr_debug(DRV_PFX "discard op failed, not supported\n");
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> @@ -393,52 +393,37 @@ int xen_blkbk_discard(struct xenbus_transaction xbt,
> struct backend_info *be)
> char *type;
> int err;
> int state = 0;
> + struct block_device *bdev = be->blkif->vbd.bdev;
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>
> - type = xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "type", NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(type)) {
> - if (strncmp(type, "file", 4) == 0) {
> - state = 1;
> - blkif->blk_backend_type = BLKIF_BACKEND_FILE;
> + if (blk_queue_discard(q)) {
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "discard-granularity", "%u",
> + q->limits.discard_granularity);
> + if (err) {
> + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> + "writing discard-granularity");
> + goto kfree;
Unrelated to the patch here, but failure to write any sort of extension
data shouldn't be considered fatal - the backend can well work without
these, and it should be left to the frontend to decide whether it wants
to live without the unavailable extensions.
Jan
> + }
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "discard-alignment", "%u",
> + q->limits.discard_alignment);
> + if (err) {
> + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> + "writing discard-alignment");
> + goto kfree;
> }
> - if (strncmp(type, "phy", 3) == 0) {
> - struct block_device *bdev = be->blkif->vbd.bdev;
> - struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> - if (blk_queue_discard(q)) {
> - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> - "discard-granularity", "%u",
> - q->limits.discard_granularity);
> - if (err) {
> - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> - "writing discard-granularity");
> - goto kfree;
> - }
> - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> - "discard-alignment", "%u",
> - q->limits.discard_alignment);
> - if (err) {
> - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> - "writing discard-alignment");
> - goto kfree;
> - }
> - state = 1;
> - blkif->blk_backend_type = BLKIF_BACKEND_PHY;
> - }
> - /* Optional. */
> - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> - "discard-secure", "%d",
> - blkif->vbd.discard_secure);
> - if (err) {
> - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> + state = 1;
> + /* Optional. */
> + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename,
> + "discard-secure", "%d",
> + blkif->vbd.discard_secure);
> + if (err) {
> + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
> "writting discard-secure");
> - goto kfree;
> - }
> + goto kfree;
> }
> - } else {
> - err = PTR_ERR(type);
> - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, "reading type");
> - goto out;
> }
> -
> err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-discard",
> "%d", state);
> if (err)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists