[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120314223102.GA27602@aftab>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:31:02 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add a per-dimm structure
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > He thinks that a multi-layer struct should be created inside that directory
> > (it could have 2 or 3 levels of directories, depending on how the memory is
> > organized at the memory controller), instead of having a large number of files
> > there.
>
> Why create subdirs? If those subdirectories are not real devices,
> showing a real hierarchy, then do not create them as userspace will get
> very confused very quickly.
Why, IMO, we agreed on the following layout
rank0/
|-- dimm_dev_type
|-- dimm_edac_mode
|-- dimm_label
|-- dimm_location
|-- dimm_mem_type
|-- CE
|-- UE
`-- dimm_size
with CE being the correctable errors counter and UE be optional and only
present when it makes sense for the hardware.
This is not multi-layered, it is very easy to implement and mirrors all
possible memory controllers from the point of view of the single DIMM.
no? Or am I missing something...?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists