[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120314224050.GA32297@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:50 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add a per-dimm structure
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:31:02PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > He thinks that a multi-layer struct should be created inside that directory
> > > (it could have 2 or 3 levels of directories, depending on how the memory is
> > > organized at the memory controller), instead of having a large number of files
> > > there.
> >
> > Why create subdirs? If those subdirectories are not real devices,
> > showing a real hierarchy, then do not create them as userspace will get
> > very confused very quickly.
>
> Why, IMO, we agreed on the following layout
>
> rank0/
> |-- dimm_dev_type
> |-- dimm_edac_mode
> |-- dimm_label
> |-- dimm_location
> |-- dimm_mem_type
> |-- CE
> |-- UE
> `-- dimm_size
>
> with CE being the correctable errors counter and UE be optional and only
> present when it makes sense for the hardware.
>
> This is not multi-layered, it is very easy to implement and mirrors all
> possible memory controllers from the point of view of the single DIMM.
> no? Or am I missing something...?
Looks fine to me, assuming "rankX" is the dimm itself?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists