[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120319163310.GB13050@burratino>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:33:10 -0500
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, romain@...bokech.com,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 05/38] PCI: ignore pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled
Greg KH wrote:
> I think you are missing the fact that this patch itself is fixing a
> regression from a previous patch :)
My logic was that 10f6dc7eede9 (PCI: Rework ASPM disable code) has
been in wide use for a while, so any regression introduced by that
patch was likely to be rare or minor.
What I missed is that the backport of 4949be16822e (PCI: ignore
pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled) is already part of a
3.0.y release, so there's no use now in considering dropping it.
So, nothing to see here. :) Thanks for explaining.
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists