linux-kernel - Re: [ 05/38] PCI: ignore pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:33:10 -0500
From:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, romain@...bokech.com,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 05/38] PCI: ignore pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled

Greg KH wrote:

> I think you are missing the fact that this patch itself is fixing a
> regression from a previous patch :)

My logic was that 10f6dc7eede9 (PCI: Rework ASPM disable code) has
been in wide use for a while, so any regression introduced by that
patch was likely to be rare or minor.

What I missed is that the backport of 4949be16822e (PCI: ignore
pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled) is already part of a
3.0.y release, so there's no use now in considering dropping it.

So, nothing to see here. :)  Thanks for explaining.

Cheers,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/