[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120321104214.GB1632@m.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:42:14 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf, tool: Add new event group management
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:44:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 19:15 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Examples (first event in brackets is group leader):
> >
> > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock)
> > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock ls
> > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock ls
> >
> > # 2 groups (cpu-clock,task-clock) (minor-faults,major-faults)
> > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock \
> > -e minor-faults,major-faults ls
> >
> > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock,minor-faults,major-faults)
> > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock \
> > -e minor-faults,major-faults ls
> >
> > # 2 groups (cpu-clock,task-clock) (minor-faults,major-faults)
> > perf record --group parsed -e cpu-clock,task-clock \
> > -e minor-faults,major-faults -e instructions ls
> >
> > # 1 group (cpu-clock,task-clock,minor-faults,major-faults,instructions)
> > perf record --group -e cpu-clock,task-clock \
> > -e minor-faults,major-faults -e instructions ls
>
> I can't help but dislike the --group/--group parsed thing...
>
> How about something like:
>
> event_group = "{", events, "}" , [ ":", event_group_mod ]
>
> Such that you can write things like:
>
> perf record -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}"
>
> perf stat -e "{cpu-clock,cycles},{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}"
> perf stat -e "{cpu-clock,cycles}" -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}"
>
> I'm not sure what the current behaviour of --group is, if you create a
> group like this, do they all sample?
>
> If so, we need some option like:
>
> perf record -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}:1"
>
> to mean, only sample on cpu-clock but use PERF_SAMPLE_READ and
> PERF_FORMAT_GROUP to read all siblings on every cpu-clock sample.
>
> Now the disadvantage is that {} needs quotes on bash, the advantage is
> that its completely natural on how to construct groups, without weird
> --group/--group parsed. Also it provides a place for group modifiers.
how about '=group' keyword followed by ':' modifier
perf record -e "cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references=group:1"
or '=$groupname' and use the group name in output like
perf stat -e "task-clock,context-switches=krava:1" ls
Performance counter stats for 'ls':
1.003695 task-clock/krava # 0.083 CPUs utilized
0 context-switches/krava # 0.000 K/sec
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists