linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F69B159.5030101@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:45:45 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@...el.com,
	mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
	vinod.koul@...el.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup

On 03/15/2012 05:50 PM, Dmitry Torokhov :
> On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal is
>> to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names.
>> This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly.
>>
>> One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated
>> sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc?
> 
> I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc.

Ok, good: I have "Acknowledgement" by several maintainers: so yes, I
will send this series via arm-soc.

Is this means that I can add your "Acked-by"?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/