lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:34:29 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Alex Gershgorin <alexg@...rolight.com>
Cc:	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"fabio.estevam@...escale.com" <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: i.MX35-PDK Add regulator support

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:

Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, I reflowed your text to
be legible.

> > >...and in many cases the supply names don't look like things I'd expect
> > >to be varying too much at runtime.  It looks like you just typed the
> > >maximum datasheet ranges in, not things that make sense for the board.

> It's not quite true, I was based on the Freescale BSP and I assume,
> that this is checked.  I also tested it on v3.3

Uh, presence in a vendor BSP isn't a guarantee of sanity...  Since you
didn't specify any consumers the regulator API obviously won't do
anything with the voltage range provided but to repeat it's really not
at all obvious that anything sane ever would.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ