[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332778595.6160.84.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:16:35 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20 v3] sparc/mm/fault_32.c: Port OOM changes to
do_sparc_fault
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:32 -0400, Kautuk Consul wrote:
[]
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c b/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c
> index 8023fd7..6da1818 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ asmlinkage void do_sparc_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int text_fault, int write,
> unsigned long g2;
> int from_user = !(regs->psr & PSR_PS);
> int fault, code;
> + unsigned int flags = (FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE |
> + (write ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0));
David meant that the indentation should be aligned
immediately after the open parenthesis:
+ unsigned int flags = (FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE |
+ (write ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0));
though perhaps this is clearer as:
unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
if (write)
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
or even separate sets.
if (write)
flags = foo;
else
flags = bar;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists