[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120326.161105.1592652605352070253.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:11:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: consul.kautuk@...il.com
Cc: paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, mingo@...e.hu, joe@...ches.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20 v3] sparc/mm/fault_64.c: Port OOM changes to
do_sparc64_fault
From: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:33:17 -0400
> + fault = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address,
> + flags | ((fault_code & FAULT_CODE_WRITE) ?
> + FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
This is so shockingly gross I'm at a loss for words. Why are you
tabbing this crap all the way into outer-space?
Make the "flags | ..." line up with the first column after the
openning parenthesis of "handle_mm_fault(".
> + perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ,
> + 1, regs, address);
Same problem.
> + perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN,
> + 1, regs, address);
Same problem.
You're making the coding style worse each iteration, not better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists