[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMLZHHSD8eRd17NyUb=Druj==4Eh+XtY=86vGQUGU1fiPMcMNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:45:10 -0600
From: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dilinger@...ued.net,
pgf@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> s/fix/break/? "Originally-from" is not a recognised tag. If this code
> is based upon an earlier version from Paul then Signed-off-by: is
> correct.
>
> What's going on here? What are you trying to communicate?
I'm trying to take Ingo's suggestion, in the thread "[patch 1/8] x86,
olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands" he wrote:
====
This is not a valid signoff sequence - the 'From: ' author of
the patch must be the first SOB line.
The way to do this is either to have a:
From: Paul Fox <pgf@...top.org>
or to covert Paul Fox's SOB to a credit line, such as:
Originally-from: Paul Fox <pgf@...top.org>
====
The original code was from Paul Fox. I changed it somewhat
significantly, and Paul approves of the end result.
Can someone suggest a way of expressing this, including tag ordering,
that will be accepted by all parties? :)
Thanks
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists