| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:45:10 -0600 From: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dilinger@...ued.net, pgf@...top.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > s/fix/break/? "Originally-from" is not a recognised tag. If this code > is based upon an earlier version from Paul then Signed-off-by: is > correct. > > What's going on here? What are you trying to communicate? I'm trying to take Ingo's suggestion, in the thread "[patch 1/8] x86, olpc: add debugfs interface for EC commands" he wrote: ==== This is not a valid signoff sequence - the 'From: ' author of the patch must be the first SOB line. The way to do this is either to have a: From: Paul Fox <pgf@...top.org> or to covert Paul Fox's SOB to a credit line, such as: Originally-from: Paul Fox <pgf@...top.org> ==== The original code was from Paul Fox. I changed it somewhat significantly, and Paul approves of the end result. Can someone suggest a way of expressing this, including tag ordering, that will be accepted by all parties? :) Thanks Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists