lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120328181023.274401d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:10:23 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: suppress page allocation failure warnings from sys_listxattr

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:54:42 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:47:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:39:51 +1100
>  > Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>  > 
>  > > > Well, the unusual thing was that I was fuzzing system calls for a few hours.
>  > > > 
>  > > > My fuzzing tool was able to trigger these very easily after an hour or two
>  > > > of uptime and memory had fragmented a little, so yeah, quite trivial.
>  > > 
>  > > We've recently been seeing reports of xfsdump trigging a similar
>  > > allocation failures in the XFS attr code when we are doing hundreds
>  > > of thousands of attribute lookups to back them up.
>  > > 
>  > > ad650f5 xfs: fallback to vmalloc for large buffers in xfs_attrmulti_attr_get
>  > > 
>  > > I think that falling back to vmalloc here is much better solution
>  > > than failing to retreive the attribute - it will work no matter how
>  > > fragmented memory gets. That means we don't get incomplete
>  > > backups occurring after days or months of uptime and successful
>  > > backups...
>  > 
>  > Yup.  How does the below look?
> 
> Don't see anything immediately wrong with it.
> Any thoughts on what to do about the similar problem in setxattr ? (memdup_user)
> 

I can't think of anything clever.

The dumb approach:

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: fs/xattr.c:setxattr(): improve handling of allocation failures

This allocation can be as large as 64k.

- Add __GFP_NOWARN so that a falied kmalloc() is silent

- Fall back to vmalloc() if the kmalloc() failed

Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/xattr.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/xattr.c~fs-xattrc-setxattr-improve-handling-of-allocation-failures fs/xattr.c
--- a/fs/xattr.c~fs-xattrc-setxattr-improve-handling-of-allocation-failures
+++ a/fs/xattr.c
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ setxattr(struct dentry *d, const char __
 {
 	int error;
 	void *kvalue = NULL;
+	void *vvalue = NULL;	/* If non-NULL, we used vmalloc() */
 	char kname[XATTR_NAME_MAX + 1];
 
 	if (flags & ~(XATTR_CREATE|XATTR_REPLACE))
@@ -334,13 +335,25 @@ setxattr(struct dentry *d, const char __
 	if (size) {
 		if (size > XATTR_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -E2BIG;
-		kvalue = memdup_user(value, size);
-		if (IS_ERR(kvalue))
-			return PTR_ERR(kvalue);
+		kvalue = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+		if (!kvalue) {
+			vvalue = vmalloc(size);
+			if (!vvalue)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+			kvalue = vvalue;
+		}
+		if (copy_from_user(kvalue, value, size)) {
+			error = -EFAULT;
+			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	error = vfs_setxattr(d, kname, kvalue, size, flags);
-	kfree(kvalue);
+out:
+	if (vvalue)
+		vfree(vvalue);
+	else
+		kfree(kvalue);
 	return error;
 }
 
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ