linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Remove a superfluous check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:26:19 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Remove a superfluous check

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:17:19PM +0200, John Kacur wrote:

> It looks okay to me. Technically it's not functionally equivalent
> though, because now when __register_ftrace_function is called
> directly, (in other paths), the test has an unlikely there.

I know, but ftrace_disabled is really unlikely to be set to 1 because
we set it only if ftrace_init() fails and on the panic path in
ftrace_kill().

So I agree that it is not functionally completely equivalent but it
should be correct with the unlikely.

> See what teven says, otherwise, you can have my reviewed by.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/