lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F764778.1030406@micron.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:54:12 +0000
From:	"Asai Thambi Samymuthu Pattrayasamy (asamymuthupa) [CONT - Type 2]" 
	<asamymuthupa@...ron.com>
To:	Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	VIRTUAL <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] block: replace rssd_disk_name_format() to
 disk_name_format()

On 3/30/2012 2:53 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote:

>  Currently, block core has been supplied "disk_name_format()", so
> we should remove duplicate function "rssd_disk_name_format()"
> and use the new function to format rssd disk names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mtip32xx.c |   33 +--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)


Looks fine.

Should the subject be "mtip32xx: ..." instead of "block: ..."? I
understand "block:" as relating to block core. I am fairly new here. If
"block:" can be used for block drivers too, that is fine too.

--
Regards,
Asai Thambi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ