[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F764778.1030406@micron.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:54:12 +0000
From: "Asai Thambi Samymuthu Pattrayasamy (asamymuthupa) [CONT - Type 2]"
<asamymuthupa@...ron.com>
To: Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
VIRTUAL <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] block: replace rssd_disk_name_format() to
disk_name_format()
On 3/30/2012 2:53 AM, Ren Mingxin wrote:
> Currently, block core has been supplied "disk_name_format()", so
> we should remove duplicate function "rssd_disk_name_format()"
> and use the new function to format rssd disk names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mtip32xx.c | 33 +--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
Looks fine.
Should the subject be "mtip32xx: ..." instead of "block: ..."? I
understand "block:" as relating to block core. I am fairly new here. If
"block:" can be used for block drivers too, that is fine too.
--
Regards,
Asai Thambi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists